CATEGORIES

Archives


Rogue Landlord in Weston super Mare

Richard Greenland

Last week I wrote about how we bought a one-bed flat about 30% BMV (below market value), when the cost of all works are factored in.

I’d been trying to contact the owner of the two top-floor flats, as to make it legally lettable we’d have to install linked fire alarms in all flats. I’d been told he wasn’t interested in cooperating in any way – not a good start. A couple of days into the refurb he pitched up on his bicycle. He refused to shake my hand, and the first thing he said to me was to tell me to move my van – it wasn’t getting any better!

I asked what he wanted to do about the alarm, and the conversation went like this:

“I don’t want to do anything about it.”

“But it doesn’t work!”

“So?”

“Well we have a legal responsibility to provide a working alarm.”

“I don’t care.”

“The maximum fine for non-compliance is £60,000.”

“So?”

“If you don’t co operate we’ll have no choice but to report you to the fire officer.”

“Ok I don’t care.”

Converted garage belonging to adjoining flat.

Unbelievable! Non-compliance also invalidates his insurance – assuming he even has any of course. We considered reporting him immediately but decided he might come to his senses and sure enough he did. As to why he was so sore at me, it became clear he’d wanted to buy it himself, but been caught out by our super-quick 4-day completion. He then assumed we were amateurs who’d over-paid, he was saying things like ‘These flats are only worth about £35K and they are cheap for a reason’ (but he later offered us £40K for it!) His face hit the floor when I told him what we’d actually paid!

I also found out from the OO (owner-occupier) in the other GFF (ground floor flat) that he’d been trying to bully her into selling cheap because of the title issues (absent freeholder and no management co). He’d been uncooperative about intercoms, communal décor and carpets, and even tried to claim that she had no right to park on her own drive. All this was making me feel more inclined to do the refurb and sell, rather than try to do BTL (buy-to-let) with this person in the building. Or we could buy him out cheaply, using the same issues he’d been trying to use against the OO, plus dry rot plus his non-compliance with the law in running illegal tenancies. I’ve offered him £40K each (same as his offer to me) for the six flats he owns in this and the adjoining block, subject to an inspection of course. A long-shot, but it would be delicious to profit from a rogue landlord!

I’ll write about how I’m changing the layout next week.

Edit – I met him again on Monday, since I wrote this blog, and he seems to have had a change of heart and was attempting to be more co operative. Also all his tenants speak well of him. And he’s offered to contribute £500 towards soundproofing our ceilings. Things may not be as straightforward as I’d assumed and we may be able to work with him after all.

Cheap Flat in Weston super Mare

Richard Greenland

We almost didn’t buy this one as it didn’t initially make my criteria of 30%+ below a conservative valuation, and minimum 12% yield. These criteria set a high bar, as I was 100% reliant on OPM (other people’s money), with all my own money tied up in existing investments. Therefore any deals had to be extremely good and virtually guarantee a big profit to any investors. Trouble was, they also meant I’d only bought one property for almost a year.

Things changed with a new investor and the idea that we’d make more money with more deals, even if each deal was less profitable individually. I was reluctant because more marginal deals are more risky with less ‘meat’ as a cushion if things go awry. Also, if we lost money on the first deal, we probably wouldn’t do business again. If we did nine profitable deals, then one went bad, we probably would. Hence I wanted the first deal to be very high profit and low risk. I don’t believe in the notion that high-profit = high risk and low profit = low risk. The way I do business it’s the other way round.

Outside decor a bit careworn

Anyway this was a one-bed ground-floor flat in Weston super Mare with a market value of £60 – £65K when complete, needing about £8K spending on layout changes and refurb. So conservatively £52K as it stood. It had been bought unseen as an auction repo for £56K by a trader who’d made a bad mistake. Buying blind is dangerous unless done in bulk and you can afford to play the numbers. I saw it posted on http://propertytribes.ning.com/forum by my friend Ant Lyons of YPN, who had already negotiated it down to £42K. It was unmortgageable having been owned less than 6 months, and in any case would be hard to mortgage with a purchase price of less than £50K. This meant Ant had changed his mind, so Ken, another friend, took it and negotiated it down to £41K. He asked me to look at it for him, and it became clear it had a number of other issues:

No management co as the director had absconded with funds.

Absent freeholder.

No linked alarm system (a legal requirement, it was in a block of 4 with one front door, and over three floors).

dry rot damage

Dry rot.

With all this to contend with, Ken decided he didn’t want it either and with his blessing I took over. I wasn’t overly concerned about the absent freeholder or lack of management co as we are cash purchasers so didn’t need a mortgage straight away. So I neg’d it down to £39K for the dry rot, based on the estimates of two independent specialist contractors.

Then we investigated titles and there was no parking at the front in spite of appearances. Further, the conversion to flats was granted planning in 1988. Flats in multiple blocks like this, non-compliant with 1991 building regs, are classified as a 257 HMO (house in multiple

Dry-rot damaged plaster and wood hidden under the floor by previous owner - very naughty!

occupation) as defined in section 257 of the Housing Act 2004.

http://www.lacors.gov.uk/lacors/ContentDetails.aspx?id=16977

and

http://www.tmbc.gov.uk/assets/housing/Landlords_Guide_to_the_Management_of_Section_257_HMOs.pdf

They need a linked alarm system in every flat, which is expensive to install, and impossible without the cooperation of all flat owners. So we further reduced our offer to £34k, agreed at £36,500, and completed within 4 days. The vendor had lost £20K by buying blind, and said on the phone he “hoped he would never hear of Locking Road, Weston S M ever again!”

I’ll write about my first encounter with the owner of the other flats next week.

Two Maisonettes Needing Renovation, Calculations For Offer.

Richard Greenland

I’ve known about this pair of large three-bed maisonettes for months but ignored them as too expensive. They belong to a housing association and have been on sale for nearly a year. They are on a single title, immediately limiting their market to investors, but have separate utility connections. They received an early offer of £165K which fell through on valuation (some people underestimate renovation and other costs and pay far too much!) They then languished for a while before £145K was agreed. This buyer wanted to convert to four one-bed flats using development finance. But there was no planning permission… Er, no permission to develop means no development finance – obviously! So when the second sale fell through the agent phoned me, and thinking a much lower offer might be accepted I went to view.

It’s not worth converting to four smaller flats. The uplift isn’t sufficient to justify the expense. There is the cost, delay and risk of a planning application. And a surprising number of people still don’t realise the cost of converting to flats is much higher nowadays. With change of use you must upgrade insulation in roofs, windows, walls and floors to meet current standards. You must also build independent ceilings and separating walls, packed with acoustic insulation, which must be expensively tested for compliance with current standards. This could easily add £20 – £30K to the budget of a small conversion like this. So renovation was what I intended.

There was quite a bit of damage, the wiring and C/H systems had been stolen. Windows were broken and some ceilings were down due to water damage. Both flats also needed the usual new kitchens, bathrooms, floor coverings and décor. About £30K of work for the two flats. So the figures:

The agent reckoned they’d be worth £100K each when finished. They might be to the right buyer, but I wouldn’t feel confident of achieving more than £95K for the top and £90K for the bottom, a GDV of £185K.

Subtract £30K for the work, giving a present value to me of £155K. I want minimum 30% discount, or a max spend of 70% x value = £108.5K.

Splitting titles would cost another £1K which has to be subtracted, giving maximum offer of £107.5K.

I then ran the calculations for a development. The renovation would take some time so there is slight justification for this, but not on the timescale of a true development so this was more to satisfy my curiosity.

Currently I’m looking for 25% profit on GDV. 75% of £185K = £138.75K.

Minus £30K for the work = £108.75K.

Minus £1K to split titles = £107.75K.

Minus £3K to the estate agent to sell, and £1.5K legal and other fees = £103.25K.

Minus cost of investor finance at a notional 3% of the amount we’d be spending (£138.75K, see above), circa £4K = £99.25K maximum offer as a development.

Note there are no utility connections or S106 contributions needing paying for in this case, which can be very expensive, other things amateur developers often overlook.

I sent an offer in with my justifications. If they languish unsold for long enough they might just come back to me.

 

Blog Widget by LinkWithin

VACANCIES

To View please phone Ruth on 0333 123 4766

February 2013

================

Studio £1213 pcm

================

2 Bed Garden Flat

£1950 pcm

*** Available Now ***
================

2 Bed Garden Flat

£2166 pcm
================

1 Bed Ground Flat

£1540 pcm

================

Studio £1256 pcm

================

1 Bed Ground Flat

£1490 pcm

================

A full list of our vacancies Read more...

Pick a Topic